Considering the young petitioner's concerns, the court scheduled the PIL for the upcoming hearing on March 13.
Digital Desk: A five-year-old youngster in Kanpur, Uttar Pradesh's Azad Nagar has filed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) seeking the removal of a liquor shop situated near his school. The young petitioner, enrolled in a private school, expressed concerns about the disturbance caused by the liquor shop's patrons, leading to an unexpected legal intervention.
Petitioner's Allegations
In his Public Interest Litigation, the child petitioner claimed that a liquor store near the school had caused disturbances. The petition claims that people who frequent the liquor store frequently cause disturbances and risk the security and well-being of the school-going children.
Court's response regarding the PIL
Following receiving the PIL, the state government counsel was instructed by a division bench consisting of Justice Manoj Kumar Gupta and Justice Kshitij Shailendra to request a response from the relevant authorities. The court asked for an explanation of why the liquor store's license was being renewed in spite of the school's construction nearby.
Considering the young petitioner's concerns, the court scheduled the PIL for the upcoming hearing on March 13. A distinctive element of the case is the five-year-old's involvement in the legal procedures, which draws attention to the larger problem of how liquor shops affect communities and educational institutions.
How the community reacted
Discussions concerning the possible dangers and disturbances brought on by liquor shops near educational institutions have been triggered by the PIL that the young student filed. The instance highlights the necessity of striking a balance between commercial objectives and pupils' safety and well-being.
The court's participation in challenging the liquor store's license renewal raises concerns about the responsible management of such businesses, particularly in locations with educational institutions. This case might establish a standard for considering the community while making decisions, especially when it comes to the security of young students.
A five-year-old's Public Interest Litigation (PIL) against a liquor shop located near his school highlights the variety of ways that legal activism can take shape. It emphasizes how crucial community safety is, particularly in places with a large concentration of educational institutions. It will be interesting to watch how the court handles the young petitioner's concerns and potential implications for liquor store licenses near schools as the case moves forward.
Leave A Comment