comScore
  • No I-T action against Anil Ambani under the Black Money Act until November 17: Bombay High Court

    National
    No I-T action against Anil Ambani under the Black Money Act until November 17: Bombay High Court




     Digital Desk: The Bombay High Court on Monday barred the Income Tax
    Department from taking any coercive action against Reliance Group chairman Anil
    Ambani under the Black Money Act until November 17, after he claimed the proceedings
    against him were based on frivolous and false allegations and challenged the
    retroactivity of the notices issued to him.



     



    On August 8, the I-T
    department issued Anil Ambani a prosecution notice under the Black Money
    (Undisclosed Foreign Income and Assets) and Imposition of Tax Act, 2015, for
    the alleged evasion of 420 crores in taxes on transactions he conducted between
    2006 and 2012.



     



    Ambani filed an appeal
    with the Supreme Court, challenging the notices.



     



    While hearing Ambani's
    petition, the division bench of justices S V Gangapurwala and R N Laddha was
    informed by senior advocate Rafiq Dada that the notices issued to him by the
    department under sections 50 and 51 of the Act in August were invalid. Dada
    contended that because the enactment went into effect only in 2015, the
    department could not have issued show-cause notices for transactions that
    occurred much earlier. The bench was informed that the statements were being
    applied retroactively and thus were null and void.



     



    The bench was also
    informed that the assessing officer had issued an order in March this year
    under section 10 (3) of the Act, stating that Ambani had undisclosed foreign
    income and assets based on transactions between 2006 and 2012, and thus owed Rs
    420 crore in income tax. The bench was informed that the proceedings against
    him were based on frivolous and false allegations, and therefore the order was
    challenged before the commissioner of income tax (appeals).



     



    The petition had also challenged the validity of various
    sections of the 2015 Act that allowed the Act to be applied retroactively to
    transactions completed before it went into effect.

    indojawa88slot thailandsabung ayam onlinesv388mahjong ways 2https://www.satudatadesa.com/Link Agen Sabung Ayam Onlineslot gacorsabung ayam onlinesabung ayam onlineagen judi bola onlinemahjong wayssitus sv388sabung ayam onlinesabung ayam onlinesabung ayam onlinesabung ayam onlinesv388