• SC urges that states and UTs execute the "one nation, one ration card" programme

    National
    SC urges that states and UTs execute the "one nation, one ration card" programme

    According to Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, speaking for the Centre during the hearing, ONORC has not yet been introduced in states like Delhi, West Bengal, Chhattisgarh, and Assam, according to Solicitor General Mehta.

    Digital Desk: The "one nation,
    one ration card" (ONORC) programme, which enables migrant workers to get
    rations at their places of employment in other states where their ration cards
    are not registered, must be implemented, the Supreme Court ruled on Friday,
    ordering states and union territories to do so.



    The
    top court also raised concerns with the Centre about how the benefit of free
    food grain until November this year under the "Pradhan Mantri Garib Kalyan
    Yojna" would reach migrant workers without ration cards. The top court
    also took strong note of the delay in developing software meant to register
    workers in the unorganised sector in order to create a national database.



    Anjali Bharadwaj, Harsh Mander, and
    Jagdeep Chhokar, activists, have filed a new application asking the Centre and
    states to ensure food security, cash transfers, transportation facilities, and
    other welfare measures for migrant workers on the grounds that they are in
    desperate need of assistance as the crisis is worse this time around. A
    vacation bench made up of justices Ashok Bhushan and M.R. Shah has also
    reserved its verdict on this new application.



    The bench requested written notes on
    the case from the Center, the petitioner activists, and the states.



    The
    application was submitted in the ongoing suo motu case from 2020 about the
    difficulties encountered by migrant workers as a result of restrictions imposed
    by the government amid an uptick in COVID-19 instances.



    According
    to Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, speaking for the Centre during the hearing,
    ONORC has not yet been introduced in states like Delhi, West Bengal,
    Chhattisgarh, and Assam, according to Solicitor General Mehta.



    The
    counsel for Delhi, however, disputed the submission, stating it had been
    implemented.



    The bench said, "You must
    implement it," when the attorney for West Bengal complained that there
    were certain problems with seeding with Aadhaar numbers. This is for migrant
    workers' welfare, which are eligible for rations in every state. The bench
    expressed concern over how migratory workers who do not own ration cards will
    be able to make use of social programmes.



    "How about registering employees
    in unorganised sectors?" Why should software development take so long? The
    bench questioned Additional Solicitor General Aishwarya Bhati, who was also
    representing the Centre, saying that you may have started it in August of last
    year, and it is still ongoing.



     



    The
    bench questioned why the centre still needs a few extra months to produce the
    software that can assist in compiling a nationwide database of workers.



    Why
    do you still need three to four months? You are not carrying out any
    research... However, all you are doing is building a module to allow data to be
    supplied into your process, it seems.



    The
    "strong" mechanism that is being created will assist authorities in
    "monitoring and oversight" of the schemes.



    "Why is it going to take so long?
    The bench noted that you are merely developing a piece of software to build the
    national database.



    Senior attorney Dushyant Dave, who was
    representing the activists, stated at the opening that assistance programmes
    needed to be made available to everyone who lacked ration cards because the
    situation was worse this year.



    The Solicitor General responded by
    stating that the Pradhan Mantri Garib Kalyan Yojna has been extended through
    November of this year and that each member of these families will receive free
    food grains totaling five kilogrammes per month. In addition, the Solicitor
    General stated that other welfare programmes must be developed and implemented
    by the states.



    Despite statements made by government
    officials, the matter has not been adequately handled, according to Colin
    Gonsalves, a prominent counsel who also cited a number of prior rulings of the
    highest court on the registration of migrant workers.



    On
    May 24, the top court had previously criticised the registration process for
    unorganised employees as being "extremely slow" and had ordered the
    government to set up communal kitchens and give dry rations for migrant workers
    who were stranded across the nation due to the Covid-19 outbreak.



    The
    activists stated in their appeal that the issues and suffering experienced by
    migrant workers during the lockdown in 2020 have persisted over the past year
    due to the ongoing economic distress and have now become worse as a result of
    new restrictions, curfews, and lockdowns being implemented in many states to
    control the spread of Covid.In May last year, the top court had taken suo motu
    cognizance of problems and miseries of migrant labourers and had passed a slew
    of directions, including asking the states not to charge fare from migrant
    workers and provide them food for free till they board trains or buses.