Social media users, on the other hand, held a different perspective and criticized the Peta campaign as ludicrous.
Digital Desk: In order to support its argument that males are
substantially more responsible for the "climate catastrophe" than
women, Peta cited a study that appeared in the journal PLOS ONE.
color:#252525">According to Peta, men who eat meat contribute 41% more to
greenhouse gas emissions.
color:#252525">Because of this, Peta is advocating a ban on having sex with
meat-eating men in an effort to convince them to become vegans.
color:#252525">Social media users, on the other hand, held a different
perspective and criticized the Peta campaign as ludicrous.
color:#252525">Here are some of the screengrabs of the reactions:
color:#252525">
color:#252525">
color:#252525">
color:#252525">
color:#252525">In a video, Dr. Carys Bennett, a Peta spokesman, asserted that
men and women had different dietary needs. Men had a larger carbon footprint
than women because they consumed more meat. The Peta sex prohibition campaign,
according to Bennett, is a "tongue in cheek" idea.
Leave A Comment