comScore
  • Supreme Court directs all States/UTs to register Suo Motu FIR Against Hate speeches Irrespective of any Religion

    National
    Supreme Court directs all States/UTs to register Suo Motu FIR Against Hate speeches Irrespective of any Religion

    The bench had previously requested a response from the state of Maharashtra in response to a contempt case alleging failure to take action against hate speeches.

    Digital
    Desk:
    The Supreme Court today broadened the scope
    of its 2022 judgement, which directed the Delhi, Uttar Pradesh, and Uttarakhand
    Police to take suo motu action against hate speech cases, and ordered all
    states and union territories to register hate speech cases even if no complaint
    was filed. The court has cautioned that failure to file cases on time will be
    viewed as contempt of court.



    color:#2E2E2E">The top court called it a severe violation and added that hate
    speech is "capable of affecting the secular fabric of the country."



    The court was hearing a
    slew of petitions alleging hate speech offences. The bench had previously
    requested a response from the state of Maharashtra in response to a contempt
    case alleging failure to take action against hate speeches.



    color:#2E2E2E">"We further make it clear that such action be taken
    irrespective of the religion of the maker of the speech, so that the secular
    character of Bharat as envisaged by the Preamble is preserved," the bench,
    composed of Justices KM Joseph and BV Nagarathna, stated in a decision issued
    today.



    The petitioners proposed
    appointing a nodal officer for each state, whereas the bench proposed one for
    each district. The petitioners also stated that a system for removing hate
    speech from social media should be established.



    color:#2E2E2E">On applications seeking FIR against union minister Anurag Thakur
    and others for hate speech, Justice KM Joseph stated that the Magistrate
    decided that sanction is required for FIR, and the High Court agreed.



    color:#2E2E2E">"The judges are apolitical and are not concerned with Party
    A or Party B, and the only thing they have in mind is the Constitution of
    India," the panel stated.



    color:#2E2E2E">It stated that the court has been hearing petitions against hate
    speeches in various sections of the country for the "greater public
    good" and to ensure the "rule of law."



    color:#2E2E2E">The case will be heard by the Supreme Court again on May 12.



     

    indojawa88slot thailandsabung ayam onlinesv388Link Agen Sabung Ayam Onlinesv388sabung ayam onlineagen judi bola onlinemahjong wayssitus sv388sabung ayam onlinesabung ayam onlinesabung ayam onlinesv388sv388agen sabung ayamagen sabung ayam