National
As arguments unfolded, the court underscored the importance of ensuring fair proceedings, particularly during a critical electoral period
<
Sarma dismissed Rijiju's assertions, clarifying that the Government of India had not initiated any such discussions...
Digital Desk: In a recent development, Assam Chief Minister Himanta Biswa Sarma has firmly denied any discussions with the central government concerning the relocation of Chakma and Hajong refugees to Assam. This statement from Sarma comes in response to Union Minister Kiren Rijiju's remarks hinting at talks to move these refugees from Arunachal Pradesh to Assam following the enactment of the Citizenship (Amendment) Act (CAA).
Speaking to reporters during a campaign meeting, Sarma dismissed Rijiju's assertions, clarifying that the Government of India had not initiated any such discussions with Assam authorities. He attributed Rijiju's comments to the political landscape in Arunachal Pradesh and expressed doubts about their authenticity.
Sarma also highlighted the logistical hurdles in accommodating these refugees in Assam, citing the unavailability of suitable land for resettlement. He confirmed that neither representatives from the Chakma and Hajong communities nor the central government had approached him on this matter. However, he pledged to engage with Rijiju after the elections to address the issue.
Rijiju, who is seeking re-election from Arunachal Pradesh, had previously mentioned the closure of citizenship avenues for foreigners or refugees in his state due to the CAA. He indicated intentions to relocate Chakma and Hajong refugees, citing discussions with Assam authorities and Union Home Minister Amit Shah, but faced resistance from residents.
The Chakma and Hajong refugees, primarily Buddhists and Hindus respectively, have been residing in Arunachal Pradesh since the 1960s, fleeing religious persecution in East Pakistan (now Bangladesh). Despite legal directives for their citizenship, the Arunachal Pradesh government's reluctance to grant them permanent resident certificates has triggered controversy and legal battles.
Leave A Comment