--°C
Loading...
Listen to Article
2 min read
80%

The HC also advised the parents that there can't be a rift in the family if the parents and children love and care for each other. According to The Indian Express, the HC told the parents, "There would be no question of any child going against the parents or parents going against the children to the Court to preserve their rights."


Digital Desk: The High Court (HC) stated that if there is love and affection between the two, there cannot be a rupture in the family, and there would be no issue of either child or parent going to Court to preserve their rights.

 

T L Nagarju had filed a 'Habeus Corpus' plea in the High Court, claiming that his daughter Nisarga had vanished from her engineering college dorm. According to The Indian Express, he said that his daughter was carried away forcibly by Nikhil, the driver.

 

Nisarga and Nikhil then appeared before the Court, where Nisarga presented that she was a major by age, having been born in 2003 and had married Nikhil of her own accord. They married in a temple on May 13 and have been living together since then.

 

She said she had decided in a "fit state of mind." and did not want to go back to living with her parents. The HC not only took down the daughter's and parents' remarks but also gave them some advice. "Our history demonstrates that there have been parents who sacrificed their lives for their children, and children who have given their lives for their parents," they said.

 

The HC also advised the parents that there can't be a rift in the family if the parents and children love and care for each other. According to The Indian Express, the HC told the parents, "There would be no question of any child going against the parents or parents going against the children to the Court to preserve their rights."

 

"The particular events and circumstances of the current case illustrate that 'love is blind and a more potent weapon than the love and devotion of the parents, family members, and society as a whole," the Court stated.

 

The Court went on to warn Nisarga, saying, "It is past time for the children to understand that life is made up of reaction, resound, and reflection." They will exact tomorrow what they are doing to their parents today." "Even according to Manusmruthi, no one can compensate his parents even in 100 years for all the pains they go through to give birth to them and raise them to adulthood," the Court ruled, quoting the 'Manusmruti.'

 

However, the Court dismissed Nisargas fathers petition saying that individuals had the autonomy to make vital decisions concerning their own life and that parents and society should have no part in it, reported The Indian Express.

FOLLOW US F
POPULAR
FEATURE
TRENDY
Delhi Gears Up For First-Ever Artificial Rain To Battle Air Pollution
Guwahati: Youth Brutally Assaulted Inside Central Mall, FIR Filed Against Staff Member
Spike in Japanese Encephalitis Cases Alarms Guwahati: GMCH Reports Rising Toll
Suspension of Evening Ferry Service Between Guwahati and North Guwahati
National Footballer Durga Boro Retires from the Field
Megapari Cricket Tour 2025: Aussie Fire Meets Island Fury