--°C
Loading...
Advertisement
Listen to Article
2 min read
80%

The E.D. said, "These amounts were utilized for direct purchase of land or for repayment of loan taken to purchase agricultural land in and around Delhi,” The officials stated the persons named in the attachment order are associates and Jain's family members.


Digital Desk: Delhi Health Minister Satyendar Jain's arrest by the Enforcement Directorate in a money laundering case has emerged as the latest breaking point between the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) and the BJP. While the Delhi Chief Minister has called the E.D. the case against Jain was "completely fake and politically motivated," the BJP has accused the AAP convenor of shielding the corrupt. 

 

Jain has been arrested under criminal sections of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA). The E.D. case was based on a CBI FIR where he was accused of having laundered money through four companies allegedly linked to him. 

  

As per the E.D. charge sheet, the investigation revealed that in 2015-16, when Jain was working in the central public works department, four firms "beneficially owned and controlled by him" received "accommodation entries (a term used for hawala transfers) to the tune of Rs 4.81 crore from shell companies against cash transferred to Kolkata-based entry operators through the hawala route."

 

In a statement issued last month, the E.D. had said it gave a provisional order under the PMLA to "attach immovable properties worth Rs 4.81 crore belonging to Akinchan Developers Pvt. Ltd.; Indo Metal Impex Pvt Ltd; Paris Infosolutions Pvt. Ltd.; Manglayatan Projects Pvt. Ltd.; J.J. Ideal, Estate Pvt. Ltd.; Swati Jain, wife of Vaibhav Jain; Sushila Jain, wife of Ajit Prasad Jain; and Indu Jain, wife of Sunil Jain."  

 

The E.D. said, "These amounts were utilized for direct purchase of land or for repayment of loan taken to purchase agricultural land in and around Delhi,” The officials stated the persons named in the attachment order are associates and Jain's family members.

 

The money laundering case against the Delhi minister stems from the CBI filed an August 2017 FIR against him and others on charges of alleged possession of disproportionate assets (DA). The CBI filed a charge sheet in December 2018, stating that the suspected DA was to the tune of Rs 1.47 crore, about 217 percent more than his known sources of income during 2015-17.

 

The Income Tax Department had also examined these transactions and issued an order attaching "Benami assets" purportedly linked to Jain.

FOLLOW US F
POPULAR
FEATURE
TRENDY
Iran Deploys Hypersonic Missiles in New Strike on Israel as Trump Issues Blunt Warning
Strict Pet Regulations: Shillong Municipal Board Mandates Dog Registration
CM Lays Foundation Stone for ₹25 Crore Centralised Community Kitchen in Dibrugarh
From Corporate  Boardrooms to Backroads: Inspiring Journey of Raju Dhakal
Aizawl Gets Rail Connectivity with Engineering Marvel Taller Than Qutub Minar