--°C
Loading...
Advertisement
Listen to Article
2 min read
80%

He attempted to contact Facebook in order to recover access to his account, but received no response. As a result, he had to go to court and deal with the corporation legally.

Digital Desk:  It appears that locking a user's account for no apparent reason costs Facebook a lot of money. A lawyer in the United States sued Facebook for shutting him out of his account and won a legal battle, with the court ordering the tech firm to pay him $50,000. When converted to Indian money, this comes to roughly Rs 41 lakh. But what prompted the social media behemoth to pay such a large sum? To fix the issue, the corporation just ignored the man. Here's the whole tale.

According to FOX 5 Atlanta, Jason Crawford filed a complaint against Facebook after his account was cancelled without appropriate explanation, and the tech giant also disregarded him to address the situation.

Because of some political comments he posted on Facebook, he had already gotten a violation notice from the platform. However, this time, his Facebook account was disabled by the corporation for no apparent reason. He attempted to contact Facebook in order to recover access to his account, but received no response. As a result, he had to go to court and deal with the corporation legally.

He was irritated by the whole thing, partially because it was so difficult to get in touch with a real person for help with Facebook concerns. Crawford discovered that he could only appeal the company's decision using his own Facebook page, which made the procedure much more cumbersome. However, because his account was locked, he couldn't access it.

"I just think it's bad business." He described it as a poor way to treat people. The individual felt trapped in a never-ending circle and compared his condition to "a dog chasing its tail." When he couldn't reach an agreement with Facebook, he had no choice but to file a lawsuit.

Crawford, a lawyer, then filed a case against Facebook in August 2022, alleging that the social media giant disregarded and refused him access to his own Facebook account due to a violation of child sexual exploitation, which he claims never occurred.

"I had, I'm not sure how to quantify it, pictures, videos, posts-old that come up as memories that I like to look at from time to time." "You know, all that stuff that I wasn't about to let a bunch of bullies take away from me for no reason," Crawford explained.

Surprisingly, even after filing a case, Facebook's legal staff did not respond. However, after the court ordered Facebook's parent company, Meta, to pay Crawford $50,000 in damages due to his ignorance, the internet corporation came out to him to settle the matter.

"I felt a little bit vindicated, and they activated my account again," Crawford said. He also disclosed that the purpose for going to court against such a large digital firm was not monetary recompense, but rather holding Facebook accountable for its activities, which include a lack of transparency and an unwillingness to respond to consumers.

FOLLOW US F
POPULAR
FEATURE
TRENDY
Megapari Cricket Tour 2025: Aussie Fire Meets Island Fury
PM Modi Showcases India's Artistry through Exquisite Gifts to Global Leaders at G7 Summit
Kamakhya Temple Gears Up for Ambubachi Mela 2025: Key Guidelines and Devotee Advisory Issued
Iran Deploys Hypersonic Missiles in New Strike on Israel as Trump Issues Blunt Warning
Strict Pet Regulations: Shillong Municipal Board Mandates Dog Registration
CM Lays Foundation Stone for ₹25 Crore Centralised Community Kitchen in Dibrugarh